最近立法院擴權的事情，用我的觀點去做一點分析整理。

Dear Friend,

最近立法院擴權的事情，雖然我沒有去現場，不過還是很關心。

在網路上資訊非常的龐雜，作為太陽花學運時代的公民記者之一，

我想還是用我的觀點去做一點分析整理好了。

我覺得其實事情並沒有那麼複雜，就是立法院如果不斷擴權的話，

它就會打破所謂的「三權分立」的一個民主基礎。

那麼因為台灣就是一個民主國家，「依法行政」是一個很重要的原則。

所以法律如果被修改得很破碎，或者是給行政的團隊處處制肘，

或者是要把許多的資料釋出給對岸的話，那麼當然對台灣的民主跟安全是相當不利的。

這個事情很單純，但是立法院現在目前透過過半數的成員可以強行通過各式各樣的法案，

可以去修未來說不定選舉罷免法或者是反滲透法，這些都可以修改。

暫時它只是現在只是要擴充地方預算，那未來可能會有更多想要擴充的東西。

消減總統權力或者是要行政團隊不得反質詢，這些可能都還是相對的小事。

但是這種事情是像滾雪球一樣，走近了一步之後它就可以往下走更多的一步。

所以，目前看起來，我是覺得在場外參與街頭運動的人，是非常勇敢而且很有力量的。

實際上能不能夠動搖立法院呢？在程序上可能沒有辦法，但是在輿論上當然有機會是可以創造出新的輿論，去讓大家知道這個事情的嚴重性。

那麼在程序上面，在我們國家至少還有「憲法」可以支撐。

憲法高於一般法律，一般法律高於判例，這個是法律的基本原則之一。

所以至少中華民國憲法還是我們可以信賴的最後防線。

那憲法要修就不是過半數的人就可以決定的，不是過半數的立委就可以決定的。

所以至少他們現在還沒有辦法去修憲。

所以如果等到大法官釋憲，然後去說明說有一些立法是不合理的，不合憲法的，立院法的事情還是會有一個煞車，不至於無限制的延燒。

所以我想大家也不需要那麼的焦慮。

以上是我簡單的評估跟分析，所以過好自己的生活，然後關心時事。我想這就是目前的想法。

補充一下

我覺得這個事情跟特定政黨的支持與否已經無關了，也跟二元對立沒有什麼關係。

這個事情就是一個非常非常單純的一個事件，然後跟對岸的操作很明顯的是有關聯的。

這個事情國外的媒體也都看得很清楚，國內的媒體我相信也是各自有各自的立場。

但是這個事情我想大家眼睛都是雪亮的。

至少，台灣目前還是一個有言論自由的國家，每個人都還是有權利公開的發表他的意見。

希望所有島上的人，不分黨派，都可以珍惜這個言論自由。

話不多說，歡迎轉載，不需要註明出處。這只是一種觀點，沒有什麼個人的角色色彩。

### 常見問題與解答

**問：如何向青少年或不到十歲的小朋友解釋複雜的政治局面？**

答：可以用簡單的比喻來解釋，例如班級和學校的關係。告訴他們，班長不能把所有學校的資源都給自己的班級，而忽略了學校其他地方的需要，這樣會讓學校運作不良。

**問：中華民國憲法的主要內容有哪些？**

答：中華民國憲法包含了多個章節，如總綱、人民的權利與義務、立法院和行政院的權力等。憲法保障了言論自由、集會結社自由、生存權、工作權、財產權等基本權利。

**問：為什麼立法院不能增加行政院的預算？**

答：立法院只能刪減預算而不能增加預算，這是為了防止立法委員無限制地將資源分配給自己的選區，從而影響國家整體的財政分配和重要建設。

**問：什麼是中華民國憲法的第70條？**

答：中華民國憲法第70條規定，立法院對於行政院所提的預算案不得為增加支出的提議。這是為了避免地方選出的立法委員利用增加預算的方式來討好選民，從而影響國家級的建設和支出。

**問：如何用白話文解釋立法院不能增加預算的概念？**

答：可以用班級的比喻來解釋。班長不能無限制地將學校的經費拉到自己的班級，只給自己的班級用，而忽略了學校其他地方的需要，這樣會讓整個學校運作不良。

**問：憲法對人民的基本權利有哪些保障？**

答：憲法保障了人民的言論自由、講學自由、著作及出版自由、秘密通訊自由、集會及結社自由、生存權、工作權、財產權、請願權、訴訟權、選舉權、罷免權、創制及復決權，以及受國民教育的權利和義務等。

**問：為什麼憲法被視為民主的最後防線和保障？**

答：憲法規範了國家的基本運作和人民的基本權利，當政府機構擴權或違法時，憲法成為保護人民權益和維持國家秩序的最後依據。

___English Version___

Dear Friend,

Although I did not go to the recent expansion of the powers of the Legislative Yuan, I am still very concerned about it.

There is a lot of information on the Internet. As one of the citizen journalists during the Sunflower Movement,

I think it’s better to use my point of view to do a little analysis and sort it out.

I think things are actually not that complicated. If the Legislative Yuan continues to expand its powers,

It will break the democratic foundation of the so-called "separation of powers."

Well, because Taiwan is a democratic country, "administration according to law" is a very important principle.

Therefore, if the law is revised in a very fragmented manner, or if it restricts the administrative team everywhere,

Or if a lot of information needs to be released to the other side, of course it will be very detrimental to Taiwan's democracy and security.

This matter is very simple, but the Legislative Yuan can currently pass various bills through a majority of its members.

We can amend the election and recall law or the anti-infiltration law in the future. These can all be revised.

For now it is just about expanding local budgets, but there may be more to expand in the future.

Reducing the power of the president or requiring the executive team to refrain from questioning may be relatively trivial matters.

But this kind of thing is like a snowball. After one step forward, it can take more steps down.

So, at the moment, I think those who participate in street movements off the court are very brave and powerful.

Can it actually shake the Legislative Yuan? There may be no solution in terms of procedures, but in terms of public opinion, there is certainly an opportunity to create new public opinion to let everyone know the seriousness of this matter.

So in terms of procedures, our country at least has a "Constitution" to support it.

The Constitution is higher than general laws, and general laws are higher than precedents. This is one of the basic principles of law.

So at least the Constitution of the Republic of China is still the last line of defense we can rely on.

If the Constitution is to be revised, it cannot be decided by a majority of the people, or by a majority of the legislators.

So at least they have no way to amend the constitution yet.

Therefore, if we wait until the justices interpret the constitution and then explain that some legislation is unreasonable and unconstitutional, the legislative matters will still have a brake and will not spread indefinitely.

So I think everyone doesn’t need to be so anxious.

The above is my simple assessment and analysis, so live your life well and then pay attention to current affairs. I guess that's the current thinking.

Add

I think this matter has nothing to do with support for a specific political party, nor does it have anything to do with binary opposition.

This matter is a very, very simple incident, and it is obviously related to the operation on the other side.

Foreign media have also seen this matter clearly, and I believe that domestic media also have their own positions.

But I think everyone has sharp eyes on this matter.

At least, Taiwan is still a country with freedom of speech, and everyone still has the right to express his or her opinions openly.

I hope that all people on the island, regardless of party affiliation, can cherish this freedom of speech.

Not much to say, you are welcome to reprint without citing the source. This is just an opinion, nothing personal about the character.

### Frequently Asked Questions and Answers

**Q: How do you explain complex political situations to teenagers or children under ten years old? **

Answer: It can be explained with a simple metaphor, such as the relationship between class and school. Tell them that monitors cannot give all the school's resources to their own classes and ignore the needs of other parts of the school, as this will make the school function poorly.

**Q: What are the main contents of the Constitution of the Republic of China? **

Answer: The Constitution of the Republic of China contains multiple chapters, such as the General Principles, the rights and obligations of the people, the powers of the Legislative Yuan and the Executive Yuan, etc. The Constitution guarantees basic rights such as freedom of speech, freedom of assembly and association, the right to survival, the right to work, and the right to property.

**Q: Why can’t the Legislative Yuan increase the budget of the Executive Yuan? **

Answer: The Legislative Yuan can only delete the budget but not increase it. This is to prevent legislators from allocating resources to their own constituencies without restrictions, thereby affecting the country's overall financial allocation and important construction.

**Q: What is Article 70 of the Constitution of the Republic of China? **

Answer: Article 70 of the Constitution of the Republic of China stipulates that the budget proposed by the Executive Yuan shall not be a proposal to increase expenditures. This is to prevent locally elected legislators from using budget increases to please voters, thereby affecting national-level construction and spending.

**Q: How to explain in vernacular the concept that the Legislative Yuan cannot increase the budget? **

Answer: It can be explained with the metaphor of a class. The class monitor cannot transfer school funds to his own class without any restrictions and only use them for his own class while ignoring the needs of other parts of the school. This will make the entire school function poorly.

**Q: What protections does the Constitution provide for people’s basic rights? **

Answer: The Constitution guarantees the people's freedom of speech, freedom of lectures, freedom of writing and publishing, freedom of secret communication, freedom of assembly and association, right to survival, right to work, property rights, right to petition, right to litigate, right to elect, right to recall, right to create and review , as well as the rights and obligations to receive national education.

**Q: Why is the Constitution regarded as the last line of defense and guarantee of democracy? **

Answer: The Constitution regulates the basic operations of the country and the basic rights of the people. When government agencies expand their powers or violate the law, the Constitution becomes the final basis for protecting people's rights and interests and maintaining national order.